Diferenzas
Isto amosa as diferenzas entre a revisión seleccionada e a versión actual da páxina.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
hiperespectral:sae-cd [2018/01/16 17:38] – [Downloads] javier.lopez.fandino | hiperespectral:sae-cd [2018/04/03 11:00] (actual) – [STACKED AUTOENCODERS FOR MULTICLASS CHANGE DETECTION IN HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES] javier.lopez.fandino | ||
---|---|---|---|
Liña 1: | Liña 1: | ||
- | Experimental results and addictional information related to the paper " | + | ====== STACKED AUTOENCODERS FOR MULTICLASS CHANGE DETECTION IN HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES ====== |
+ | |||
+ | Experimental results and addictional information related to the paper " | ||
==== Abstract ==== | ==== Abstract ==== | ||
- | Change detection (CD) in multitemporal datasets is a key task in remote sensing. In this paper, a scheme to perform multiclass CD for remote sensing hyperspectral datasets extracting features by means of Stacked Autoencoders (SAEs) is introduced. The scheme combines multiclass and binary CD to obtain an accurate multiclass change map. The multiclass | + | Change detection (CD) in multitemporal datasets is a key task in remote sensing. In this paper, a scheme to perform multiclass CD for remote sensing hyperspectral datasets extracting features by means of Stacked Autoencoders (SAEs) is introduced. The scheme combines multiclass and binary CD to obtain an accurate multiclass change map. The multiclass CD begins with the fusion of the multitemporal data followed by feature extraction by SAE. The binary CD is based on the spectral |
- | CD begins with the fusion of the multitemporal data followed by feature extraction by SAE. The binary CD is based on | + | |
- | the spectral | + | |
- | lished | + | |
Liña 32: | Liña 31: | ||
* Training samples randomly chosen in each run. | * Training samples randomly chosen in each run. | ||
* 10 independent runs for each classifier. | * 10 independent runs for each classifier. | ||
- | * SVM classification carried out using the LIB-SVM library and the Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) | + | * SVM classification carried out using the LIB-SVM library and the Gaussian radial basis function (RBF). |
* ELM configured with a sigmoidal activation function. | * ELM configured with a sigmoidal activation function. | ||
Liña 38: | Liña 37: | ||
=== Image files === | === Image files === | ||
- | {{: | + | |Reference data of changes |Binary CD map |Multiclass CD map| |
- | {{: | + | |{{: |
- | {{: | + | |
- | === Accuracy results === | ||
- | Binary CD accuracies. | ||
- | | Corect | Missed Alarms| False Alarms | Total Error| | ||
- | |---|---|---|---| | ||
- | | 77020 (98.74%) | 509 | 471 | 980 (1.25%) | | ||
+ | === Accuracy results === | ||
+ | ==Binary CD accuracies== | ||
+ | |**Corect** |**Missed Alarms**|**False Alarms** |**Total Error**| | ||
+ | |77020 (98.74%) |509 |471 |980 (1.25%) | | ||
- | Multiclass CD accuracies. | ||
- | | Classifier | Parameters | + | ==Multiclass CD accuracies== |
- | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | + | |**Classifier** | **Parameters** |**FE** | **OA (%)** |
- | | ELM | N=120 | PCA | 91.73 | 76.06 | 86.83 | | + | | ELM |
- | | ELM | N=120 | NWFE | 91.76 | 76.75 | 86.83 | | + | | ELM |
- | | ELM | N=60 | SAE | 95.19 | 90.45 | 92.31 | | + | | ELM |
- | | SVM | C: 64.0 γ: 32.0 | PCA | 91.46 | 71.16 | 86.46 | | + | | SVM |
- | | SVM | C: 32.0 γ: 16.0 | + | | SVM |
- | | SVM | C: 32.0 γ: 0.0625 | + | | SVM |
C: penalty term in the training of the SVM. γ: radius of the gaussian function of the SVM. N: Number of neurons in the hidden layer of the ELM. FE: Feature Extraction method. | C: penalty term in the training of the SVM. γ: radius of the gaussian function of the SVM. N: Number of neurons in the hidden layer of the ELM. FE: Feature Extraction method. |